| ▼ | Mobileye | $8.88 | -2.42% | YTD -14.94% |
| ▼ | Aptiv | $47.03 | -3.86% | YTD -38.19% |
| ▼ | Tesla | $345.13 | -1.71% | YTD -23.26% |
| ▼ | Nvidia | $216.85 | -0.33% | YTD +16.27% |
| ▲ | LKQ Corp | $25.98 | +1.64% | YTD -13.97% |
This week, collision shops are asking a harder question: how do you blueprint a vehicle for repair when ADAS systems change the whole scope of work? It's not just about calibration anymore.
The industry is starting to see that ADAS systems don't fit neatly into traditional repair blueprinting. Cameras, sensors, and calibration dependencies mean work order sequencing, parts ordering, and scope estimation all shift. Shops that ignore this end up with scope creep, timeline surprises, and denied calibrations. The blueprint itself has to change.
Source: Field Notes →
DM me 'audit' on LinkedIn. I'll review your last 3 denied calibrations and write the OEM-cited justification that flips them. Free. No pitch.
Connect on LinkedIn →📤 Know a shop that should read this?
One forward could save them three hours of denial fights this month.
Read more issues in the ADAS Brew archive · or subscribe to get them by email.